Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

827 So. 2d 382

Harris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 9, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-10-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2007

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-10-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Elisarmes Harris appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. Assuming, without deciding, that the motion of defendant-appellant Harris is cognizable under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the record conclusively refutes it. The plea colloquy on page 6 specifically states, ‘You are now sentenced as a habitual offender.” As to defendant’s claim that he does not qualify as a habitual offender, the qualifying offenses were specifically read into the record of the same plea colloquy.

¶2Affirmed.

/827/so2d/382 · .json · Public domain