827 So. 2d 804 - Overy v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 467 So. 2d 964 - Rudd v. Rudd · 588 So. 2d 889 - Lockett v. A.L. Sandlin Lumber Co. · 406 So. 2d 932 - Pons v. Phillips · 710 So. 2d 454 - Nichols v. Ingram Plumbing · Griffin v. Bank Street Finance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Although neither party has addressed the issue, this court must determine whether it has jurisdiction over this appeal. Jurisdictional matters are of such importance that a court may take notice of them ex mero motu. Nichols v. Ingram Plumbing , 710 So.2d 454 (Ala.Civ.App. 1998). `The timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional act.' Rudd v. Rudd , 467 So.2d 964 , 965 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985)."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A judgment is effective at the time of its notation in the civil docket or its notation on separately maintained bench notes or upon the filing of a separate judgment or order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] trial court may `render' a judgment by making a notation on the case action summary, and such a notation constitutes the `entry' of the trial court's judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.