Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 SW2D 408 - Zarsky v. State

Zarsky v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Flagg Brothers Inc v. Brooks J Lefkowitz · Lord Electric Co. v. United States · PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins · Alder v. United States · Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On the morning of appellant’s arrest, Hopkins approached appellant, identified himself and requested that appellant leave the property. Hopkins testified that he had the authority to take care of the property; appellant, in his testimony, acknowledged that Hopkins had the authority to ask him to leave.... We find this evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction. Appellant was not prosecuted for entering the property. He was prosecuted for remaining on the property after being notified to leave.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.