Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 828 F.2d 1107 - Rochon v. Dawson

Rochon v. Dawson’s Empirical Analysis

828 F.2d 1107 · 1987

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Mondy v. Secretary of the Army (1988), Young v. Quinlan (1992)

28 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

26019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Romandette v. Weetabix Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a plaintiff may not remain silent and do nothing to effectuate such service. At a minimum, a plaintiff should request service upon the appropriate defendant and attempt to remedy any apparent service defects of which a plaintiff has knowledge.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to rely upon service by the U.S. Marshals and should not be penalized for failure of the Marshal's Service to properly effect service of process, where such failure is through no fault of the litigant”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.