Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 828 F.2d 1111 - United States v. Caudle

United States v. Caudle’s Empirical Analysis

828 F.2d 1111 · 1987

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
July 2013
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2013

14 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 811 (§ 201 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. American Trucking Associations · Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · Gore v. United States · American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Preterm, Inc. v. Dukakis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(h)(1) * * * Such an order may not be issued before the expiration of thirty days from— (A) the date of the publication by the Attorney General of a notice in the Federal Register of the intention to issue such order and the grounds upon which such order is to be issued, * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.