Sunkyong International, Inc. v. Anderson Land & Livestock Co.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

21 federal appellate · 4 district · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “points one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inferences sustaining the position of the non-moving party.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Charles Woods Television Corp. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc. · Nanoski v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

2. “1) consider the evidence in the light most favorable to [Scher], who prevailed with the jury; 2) assume that all conflicts in the evidence were resolved by the jury in [Scher’s] favor; 3) assume as proved all facts which [Scher’s] evidence tends to prove; 4) give [Scher] the benefit of all favorable inferences which may reasonably be drawn from the facts proved; and 5) affirm the denial of the motion if reasonable persons could differ as to the conclusions to be drawn from it.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Scher v. Engelke

3. “acts and circumstances between spouses may not have the same significance ... as the same acts and circumstances between strangers might have.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Connors v. Ryan's Coal Co.