Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 828 F.2d 1320 - M.M. Winter v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor-Respondent

M.M. Winter v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Intervenor-Respondent’s Empirical Analysis

828 F.2d 1320 · 1987

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
April 1997
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2321 · 49 U.S.C. § 10901 · 49 U.S.C. § 10903 · 49 U.S.C. § 10904 · 5 U.S.C. § 706

Relies on Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · New York Dock Railway v. United States · Black v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A letter notifying the Commission of the abandonment is no longer required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.