Donn v. Baer’s Empirical Analysis
828 F.2d 487 · 1987
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2014
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Moody v. Daggett · Cooper v. Lockhart · Sutherland v. McCall · Heath v. United States Parole Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[h]aving taken the constitutionally significant step of executing its violator warrant, the Commission was obligated to afford Donn a revocation hearing within time limits set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 4214.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thompson v. Crabtree“[W]e established [in Morrissey ] execution of the warrant and custody under that warrant as the operative event triggering any loss of liberty attendant upon parole revocation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thompson v. Crabtree“as soon as practicable after discovery of the alleged violation, except when delay is deemed necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bennett v. Bogan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.