Beeman v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
828 F.2d 620 · 1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2020
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Relies on Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Minnesota v. United States · Aminoil U. S. A., Inc. v. California State Water Resources Control Board · Dyer v. Greif Bros.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he court to which such civil action is removed is not precluded from hearing and determining any claim in such civil action because the State court from which such civil action is removed did not have jurisdiction over that claim.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.