United States v. Darrell’s Empirical Analysis
828 F.2d 644 · 1987
Citation profile
59 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably United States v. Alexander (1995), United States v. Pappert (1997)
59 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1818 · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Hamling v. United States · Alford v. United States · Bell v. United States · National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of Indians
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whoever— “(g) ... for the purpose of obtaining anything of value from any person, or for any other purpose— “(2) with intent to deceive, falsely represents a number to be the social security account number assigned by the Secretary to him or to another person, when in fact such number is not the social security account number assigned by the Secretary to him or to such other person; “... shall be guilty of a felony_””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we may neither weigh conflicting evidence nor consider the credibility of witnesses.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) for any purpose, (2) with intent to deceive, (3) represented a particular social security account number to be his or another person's, (4) which representation was false.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.