Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 828 F.2d 662 - Ritter v. Thigpen

Ritter v. Thigpen’s Empirical Analysis

828 F.2d 662 · 1987

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably 577 So. 2d 474 - Kuenzel v. State (1990), Coral v. State (1992)

17 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

13019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Kuhlmann v. Wilson · Sloan v. Hicks · Jones v. Howard · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Mullins Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Cases in the Eleventh Circuit ... clearly h[o]ld the `overlap' claim does not rise to a constitutional level.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A grant of certiorari does not constitute new law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “decided case upon which to pass a new law claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.