Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 828 F.2d 75 - duPont v. Brady

duPont v. Brady’s Empirical Analysis

828 F.2d 75 · 1987

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc. (1992), Wilson v. Saintine Exploration & Drilling Corp. (1989)

11 federal appellate ·

1701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean Society · Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Rodriguez · Rochez Bros. v. Rhoades

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “generally indeterminable fact of what would have happened but for the omission [or the misrepresentations that skewed the market value of stock] would reduce the protection against fraud afforded by Section 10(b).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a reasonable investor might have considered them important in the making of [a] decision”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a defendant can avoid liability under Rule 10b-5 for nondisclosure of material information [only] by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that disclosure of that information would not have altered the plaintiffs investment decision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.