Alvarez v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
828 F.3d 288 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez · Moskal v. United States · Moncrieffe v. Holder · Gilbert v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inexplicably ignor[ing] [an appellant's] arguments in its response brief”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“outright fail[ing] to join in the adversarial process”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'expansive[ly]' as merely 'relating to' a generic federal crime,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Salazar v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.