Patchak v. Jewell’s Empirical Analysis
828 F.3d 995 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 8772 · 25 U.S.C. § 465 · 25 U.S.C. § 479 · 28 U.S.C. § 1605A · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · United States v. Sherwood · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · William Marbury v. James Madison · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While it may be true that Mr. Patchak was adversely affected as a result of the legislation, the record does not show that Congress acted with any punitive or retaliatory intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[i]n order to decide whether a statute impermissibly inflicts punishment, [the Court] consider[s] each case in 'its own highly particularized context.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[T]he means employed by the statute must be rationally designed to meet its legitimate nonpunitive goals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.