Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 828 F. Supp. 1413 - Morley v. Stenberg

828 F. Supp. 1413 - Morley v. Stenberg’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The word 'probability' brings to mind terms such as 'chance,' 'possibility,' 'likelihood' and 'plausibility'—none of which appear to suggest the high level of certainty which is required to be convinced of a defendant's guilt 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' " Morley v. Stenberg, 828 F.Supp. 1413, 1422 (1993). All of these terms, however, are consistent with the interpretation of "substantial doubt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “whether the challenged language tends to overstate the degree of doubt required to acquit or understate the degree of certainty required to convict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “arising from mere possibility, from bare imagination, or from fanciful conjecture,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.