828 F. Supp. 1413 - Morley v. Stenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The word 'probability' brings to mind terms such as 'chance,' 'possibility,' 'likelihood' and 'plausibility'—none of which appear to suggest the high level of certainty which is required to be convinced of a defendant's guilt 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' " Morley v. Stenberg, 828 F.Supp. 1413, 1422 (1993). All of these terms, however, are consistent with the interpretation of "substantial doubt”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Victor v. Nebraska“whether the challenged language tends to overstate the degree of doubt required to acquit or understate the degree of certainty required to convict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Morley v. Stenberg“arising from mere possibility, from bare imagination, or from fanciful conjecture,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Victor v. Nebraska
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.