Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 828 FSUPP 1544 - Jane L. v. Bangerter

Jane L. v. Bangerter’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
October 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2010

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

140199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Blum v. Stenson · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Lemon v. Kurtzman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Fees of the clerk and marshal; (2) Fees of the court reporter for all or any part of the stenographic transcript necessarily obtained for use in the case; (3) Fees and disbursements for printing and witnesses; (4) Fees for exemplification and copies of papers necessarily obtained for use in the case; (5) Docket fees under section 1923 of this title; (6) Compensation of court appointed experts, compensation of interpreters, and salaries, fees, expenses, and costs of special interpretation services under section 1828 of this title.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t is often important to analyze and exclude duplication of time spent on aspects of a case where several lawyers, paraprofessionals and/or clerks are working simultaneously.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]f the same task is performed by more than one lawyer, multiple compensation should be denied. ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.