State v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State v. Jacobs · 445 So. 2d 1198 - State v. Wright · State v. Shapiro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to any issue in the case. La. C.E. art. 611. Character witnesses may be cross-examined concerning relevant specific instances of conduct. La. C.E. art. 405. The State has the right to rebut testimony elicited from a witness by the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he defense opened the door to evidence concerning the defendant's character.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.