Casey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Grady v. Corbin · Illinois v. Vitale · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State has a valid interest in avoiding problems which would interfere with its lawful prosecution of alleged crimes and in being able to research and prepare responses to claims of double jeopardy. It also has a valid interest in being able to investigate and present any evidence which might exist that supports or 'controverts claims of double jeopardy in order that prosecutions continue when it is proper to do so. It has an interest in conserving valuable judicial time by not going through unnecessary trials when a double jeopardy claim is valid.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ramirez v. State · King v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.