Gee v. Estes Mj D C J’s Empirical Analysis
829 F.2d 1005 · 1987
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 23 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Hall v. Bellmon (1991), Northington v. Jackson (1992)
42 federal appellate · 23 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on United States v. Raddatz · Sigmond v. United States · Spears v. Ol McCotter · Martinez v. Aaron · Urbanek v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In conducting this review, the district court must, at a minimum, listen to a tape recording or read a transcript of the evidentiary hearing.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When objections are made to the magistrate's factual findings based on conflicting testimony or evidence, both Sec. 636(b)(1) and Article III of the United States Constitution require de novo review.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Branch v. Martin · Clark v. Poulton“clearly indicate that it is conducting a de novo determination”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.