Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 829 F.2d 1189 - Ireland v. Shultz

Ireland v. Shultz’s Empirical Analysis

829 F.2d 1189 · 1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
August 1988
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Carey v. Piphus · Service v. Dulles · Vitarelli v. Seaton · Polos v. United States · Rogers v. Ink

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.