Chrupcala v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
829 F.2d 1269 · 1987
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 20 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 130 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Plummer v. Apfel (1999), Rutherford v. Barnhart (2005)
18 federal appellate · 20 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Richardson v. Perales · Montana v. United States · Armstrong v. Manzo · Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] hypothetical question must reflect all of a claimant's impairments that are supported by the record; otherwise the question is deficient and the expert's answer to it cannot be considered substantial evidence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Fairness would certainly seem to require an adequate showing of medical improvement whenever an ALJ determines that disability should be limited to a specified period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“once the 60-day period during which the Appeals Council may itself decide to review a hearing decision has expired, [20 C.F.R.] Sec. 404.969 serves to bar the Appeals Council from delving into issues not appealed by the claimant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rice v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.