Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 829 F.2d 479 - United States v. Charters

United States v. Charters’s Empirical Analysis

829 F.2d 479 · 1987

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
7
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably White v. Napoleon (1990), Armstrong v. State (1999)

20 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

2001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 18 U.S.C. § 4246 · 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Schmerber v. State of California · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Boyd v. United States · Dusky v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he right to be free of unwanted physical invasions”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Congress deemed adequate to determine the probability that the individual would regain competence in the foreseeable future.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a determination as to the individual's mental condition [must] be made within four months.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.