Ayala v. Chappell’s Empirical Analysis
829 F.3d 1081 · 2016
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Batson v. Kentucky · Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the [petitioner] must show that counsel's performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the "counsel" guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the [petitioner] must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the [petitioner] of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Livaditis v. Davis“Brumfield v. Cain , --- U.S. ----, 135 S. Ct. 2269 , 2277, 192 L.Ed.2d 356 (2015).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dixon v. Ryan“Wood v. Allen , 558 U.S. 290 , 301, 130 S.Ct. 841 , 175 L.Ed.2d 738 (2010).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dixon v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.