In re Burgest’s Empirical Analysis
829 F.3d 1285 · 2016
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Stinson v. United States · 135 S. Ct. 2551 - Johnson v. United States · United States v. Vega-Castillo · Beckles v. United States · Jordan v. Secretary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has three prior qualifying ACCA convictions that survive Johnson 's invalidation of the residual clause, which means that his application fails to make a prima facie showing that he is entitled to relief under Johnson .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.