Florez v. Central Intelligence Agency’s Empirical Analysis
829 F.3d 178 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3024 · 50 U.S.C. § 3507 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act)
Relies on Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Barefoot v. Estelle · United States v. Wells · Central Intelligence Agency v. Sims · Oglesby v. United States Department of the Army
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are accorded a presumption of good faith.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The government bears the burden of demonstrating that an exemption applies to each item of information it seeks to withhold, and all doubts as to the applicability of the exemption must be resolved in favor of disclosure.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“bear[ ] upon the sufficiency of the justifications set forth by the CIA in support of its Glomar response”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.