Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 829 F.3d 558 - United States v. Borders

United States v. Borders’s Empirical Analysis

829 F.3d 558 · 2016

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2313 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Olano · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Rita v. United States · Sells v. United States · United States v. Felix

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plain error means an error that is clear under current law, caused prejudice, and seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[e]ven if [the defendant] was not himself a fence, he personally participated in [the fence's] activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “stored stolen property at [the fence's] storage facility,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.