829 F. Supp. 202 - Hampton v. ITT Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash · Crooker v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court has recently held that statutory claims may be the subject of an enforceable arbitration agreement. In Gilmer , the Court held that an arbitration agreement would be enforced as to claims under the [ADEA]. The Gil-mer Court stated that a party should be held to its agreement to arbitrate unless “Congress itself has evinced an intention to preclude a waiver of judicial remedies for the statutory rights at issue.” Plaintiffs have not made any showing that Congress intended to preclude arbitration as to the FLSA claims. Nor is there any showing of inconsistency or conflict between arbitration and the FLSA’s underlying purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court finds these authorities consistent with the Supreme Court’s instruction that arbitration is to be favored, [], and with the Supreme Court’s express refusal in Gilmer to adopt the expansive interpretation of section 1 that plaintiffs seek.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.