Sukumar v. Nautilus, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 35 U.S.C. § 292 · 7 U.S.C. § 13A · 7 U.S.C. § 16 · 7 U.S.C. § 6O
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Erickson v. Pardus · Hines v. Davidowitz · Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress occupies a certain field by regulating so pervasively that ttiere is,.no room left for the states to supplement federal law, or , where there is a federal interest ... so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on''the' same subject.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.