Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 829 N.E.2d 21 - Conner v. State

Conner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Griffith v. United States · Toliver v. County of Sullivan · Target Corp. v. Hollister · Pritchett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sudden heat occurs when a defendant is provoked by anger, rage, resentment, or terror, to a degree sufficient to obscure the reason of an ordinary person, prevent deliberation and premeditation, and render the defendant incapable of cool reflection.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[29] Alternatively, Whitt argues that even if the killing was knowing or intentional, it was done in sudden heat and therefore he should have been convicted of only voluntary manslaughter. A person who knowingly or intentionally kills another human being while acting under sudden heat commits voluntary manslaughter, a Level 2 felony. Ind. Code § 35-42-1-3 . The existence of sudden heat is a mitigating factor that reduces what otherwise would be murder to voluntary manslaughter. Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Sudden heat excludes malice, and neither mere words nor anger, without more, provide sufficient provocation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.