Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 829 NE2D 612 - Shriner v. State

Shriner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kien v. State · Kalady v. State · Wells v. State · Willoughby v. State · 223 Ill. App. 3d 794 - Mayol v. Summers, Watson & Kimpel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In general, a reference to a polygraph examination without an agreement by both parties is inadmissible and grounds for error. Proof of the fact that a polygraph examination was taken or refused is, in the absence of waiver or stipulation, inadmissible in a criminal prosecution. A defendant is prohibited from stating he offered to take a polygraph test[,] and the State is equally prohibited from referring to such a test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'A mistrial should be granted where the accused, under all the circumstances, has by such trial proof been placed in a position of grave peril to which he should not have been subjected.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] mistrial is an extreme remedy and should only be used when no other curative measure will rectify a situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.