Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

829 So. 2d 1005

Stice v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 15, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-11-15

Relies on Vause v. State · Pantle v. State

Decided 2002-11-15

PER CURIAM.

¶1Michael Ray Stice appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.800(a) motion. In accordance with Pantle v. State, 784 So.2d 1139*1006(Fla. 2d DCA 2001), Stice is entitled to be resentenced under the 1994 guidelines. We certify conflict with Vause v. State, 803 So.2d 799 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

¶2Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

GREEN, DAVIS and COVINGTON, JJ., concur.
/829/so2d/1005 · .json · Public domain