Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

829 So. 2d 271

Docket No. 2D01-1691.

James v. State

Hardy JAMES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 13, 2002.

Rehearing Denied November 5, 2002.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-09-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2009

1 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-09-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Andrea S. Manthorne, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3KELLY, Judge.

¶4In this appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we find no error in Hardy James, Jr.'s convictions for carjacking, robbery by sudden snatching, attempted robbery, and aggravated fleeing and eluding. Accordingly, we affirm James' convictions. We also find no error in James' sentences. James asserts that the trial court improperly sentenced him to equal concurrent sentences as a habitual felony offender and prison releasee reoffender on the carjacking count. While the State does not challenge this assertion, our review of the record indicates that James received a thirty-year minimum mandatory sentence as a prison releasee reoffender, but he was not also sentenced as a habitual offender on that count.

¶5Affirmed.

¶6NORTHCUTT and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

/829/so2d/271 · .json · Public domain