829 So. 2d 937
Docket No. 4D02-2714.
William L. MATTERN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-10-09
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2006
2 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“[a]ny petition for writ of mandamus directed to the Department of Corrections must be filed in the county where appellant is incarcerated.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 898 So. 2d 212 - Griffith v. Crosby
Relies on DEPARTMENT OF CORR., STATE OF FL. v. Mattress · Burks v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-10-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1William L. Mattern, Belle Glade, pro se.
¶2No appearance required for appellee.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4Affirmed without prejudice to pursue administrative remedies. See Dep't of Corr. v. Mattress,686 So.2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Any petition for writ of mandamus directed to the Department of Corrections must be filed in the county where appellant is incarcerated. See Burks v. State,789 So.2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).
¶5KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.