Talamantez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Howard v. United States · Crocker v. State · Bates v. State · Mutscher v. State · Drake v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one engages in official misconduct whenever one forms the requisite specific intent at the outset or in the course of or after misusing any thing of value belonging to the government”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Margraves v. State“(a) A public servant commits an offense if, with intent to obtain a benefit or with intent to harm another, he intentionally or knowingly:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Margraves v. State“1. to apply wrongly ... 2. to misuse or spend (as public money without proper authority).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Margraves v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.