Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 829 SW2D 400 - State v. Remsing

State v. Remsing’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Grady v. Corbin · Illinois v. Vitale · United States v. Felix · Ex Parte Peterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The applicable rule is that, where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The charging instruments rely on different elements for the two offenses. The fact that the State may offer evidence of appellee’s failure to drive in a single marked lane to establish probable cause does not elevate this conduct to an element of the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.