Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2010
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hart v. State · Viers v. State · Scott v. State · State ex rel. Singh v. Purkett · Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A sentence of imprisonment shall commence when a person convicted of a crime in this state is received into custody of the department of corrections or other place of confinement where the offender is sentenced. Such person shall receive credit toward the service of a sentence of imprisonment for all time in prison, jail or custody after the offense occurred and before the commencement of the sentence, when the time in custody was related to that offense ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“temporarily permitted to go outside of the facility without being accompanied by a guard with the understanding he was required to return to St. Mary's ... that evening”); State v. Galvan, 795 S.W.2d 113 , 115 (Mo.Ct.App.1990) (noting a defendant was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.