Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 363rd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Latimer v. Stainer · Matson v. State · Turner v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f conflicting inferences concerning [the defendant’s] intent exist, this Court must presume — even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record — that the trier of fact resolved any such conflict in favor of the prosecution, and we must defer to that resolution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MacK v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.