Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 829 SW2D 897 - State v. Randy Tim Pittman

State v. Randy Tim Pittman’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Muller · State v. Demaret · State v. Barker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The state is entitled to appeal an order of a court in a criminal ease if the order: [[Image here]] (2) arrests or modifies a judgment [[Image here]] (d) The prosecuting attorney may not make an appeal under Subsection (a) or (b) of this article later than the 15th day after the date on which the order, ruling or sentence to be appealed is entered by the court. [[Image here]] (i) In this article “prosecuting attorney” means the county attorney, district attorney, or criminal district attorney who has the primary responsibility of prosecuting cases in the court hearing the case and does not include an assistant prosecuting attorney.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.