¶1By order returnable August 17, respondent was directed to show cause why he should not be suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law pending his compliance with an order which had directed his appearance on July 17,1981 for examination under oath regarding inquiries under investigation by petitioner. Application granted by default, and respondent, George T. Martin, suspended as an attorney and counselor at law until further order of this court. Order entered. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
83 A.D.2d 913
In re Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 20, 1981
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1981-08-20
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1996
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1981-08-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →