Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 ALA 284 - Smith v. Gibson

Smith v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2019

10 state decisions

3018871890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peabody v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However transiently the defendant may have been in the State, the summons having been legally served upon him, the jurisdiction of his person was complete, in the absence of a fraudulent inducement to come.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.