Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

83 Ala. 54

Dreyfus v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1887

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1887-12-15

<p> Indictment for Betting cd Cards in Public Place. </p> <p>1. Sufficiency of indictment. — An indictment for betting at cards in a public place (Code, §§ 4209,4207), must allege that a game “was played” at one of the prohibited places, and that the defendant “did bet” at said game; and the latter averment, without the former, is not sufficient.</p>

Relies on Johnson v. State · Napier v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1887-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1946

6 state decisions

401887189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

CLOPTON, J.

¶1— The indictment is found under section 4209 of the Code of 1876, which makes betting or hazarding any money, bank-notes, or other things of value, at any game prohibited by section 4207, an indictable offense. Section 4207 forbids playing “at any game with cards, dice, or any device or substitute for either cards or dice, at any tavern, inn, storehouse for retailing spirituous liquors, or house or place where spirituous liquors are sold, retailed or given away; or in any public house, highway, or other public place, or any outhouse where people resort.” The offense denounced by this section does not consist in merely playing a game with cards or dice, or a device or substitute therefor, but in playing such game at one of the prohibited places. To constitute the offense with which the defendant is charged, the-necessary constituents of the offense forbidden by section 4207, with the wager element superadded, are *55essential. An indictment charging the offense, no form in such case being prescribed by the statute, must aver all the facts necessary to the guilt of the accused. It should aver, that a game with cards, dice, or a device or substitute for cards or dice, was played at one of the places enumerated in the statute, and that the defendant bet thereon. The indictment does not sufficiently aver that a game was played. Johnson v. State, 75 Ala. 7; Napier v. State, 50 Ala. 168.

¶2[Reversed and remanded.

/83/ala/54 · .json · Public domain