Crouch v. Pixler’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
2 district · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc. (1983), Sharp v. Hui Wahine, Inc. (1966)
2 district · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Pyle · Eldredge v. Miller · Matson v. Bradbury · Collins v. Riverside Amusement Park Co. · Mason v. Mason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The judgment as to the $2,500 is affirmed, and reversed as to the $800 attorney’s fees.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““The issue as to reasonable attorney’s fees was ■ not submitted to the jury, and no evidence was adduced as to the services rendered by the attorney or the reasonable value thereof.” 83 Ariz. 310, 315 , 320 P.2d 943, 946 (1958)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““If this note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection we agree to pay a reasonable attorney fee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crews v. Collins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.