Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 CAL 460 - Ex parte Spencer

Ex parte Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
13
states following
February 1998
most recently cited

3 district · 69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently February 1998 · most notably Chula v. Superior Court (1962), Bradley v. Superior Court (1957)

3 district · 69 state decisions — followed in 13 states

16018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Galland v. Galland · Ex parte Perkins · Eidenmuller v. Eidenmuller · Wilson · Ex parte Cottrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The order for such allowance, or any subsequent order made in modification thereof, is subject to review upon appeal, (citing authorities) but, until reversed, it must be obeyed, or the party must purge himself of contempt by showing his inability to pay it, and that the inability is not occasioned by his own act, for the purpose of avoiding payment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The Court will look at the substance of the thing, and not defeat its object merely because somebody has misnamed it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.