83 Cal. App. 2d 153 - King v. Mortimer’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently October 2001 · most notably 11 Cal. 3d 113 - Minsky v. City of Los Angeles (1974), 21 Cal. 3d 801 - Bullis v. Security Pacific National Bank (1978)
2 federal appellate · 66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 20 Cal. 2d 713 - Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of Medicine · 29 Cal. 2d 34 - Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters · Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeToth · Steen v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners · Alexander v. State Personnel Bd. of Cal.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In order that a complaint be vulnerable to attack by demurrer raising a specific statute of limitations, it must affirmatively appear on the face of the complaint that the whole of the cause of action is necessarily barred by the pleaded statute. [Citing cases.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.