Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 CALAPP2D 435 - People v. Raleigh

People v. Raleigh’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 1970
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 1970 · most notably 63 Cal. 2d 614 - People v. Grubb (1965), 111 Cal. App. 2d 9 - People v. Pearson (1952)

26 state decisions

1401948195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 74 Cal. App. 178 - People v. Follette · People v. Madison · People v. Canales · 71 Cal. App. 181 - People v. Brown · People v. Cato

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ It is clear that under the rule of the foregoing authorities, evidence of defendant’s prior possession of a gun, and the circumstances thereof, was admissible even though such evidence tended to show independent wrongful acts. It is contended, however, that even though such rule might apply under ordinary circumstances, it cannot apply where, as here, there was a court dismissal of the independent crimes shown. However, the rule is well settled in England as well as in this country that an acquittal (and of course a dismissal at the preliminary examination is not even as strong in effect as an acquittal) does not prevent the admissibility of the evidence. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.