People v. Grayson’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2013
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 25 Cal. 2d 341 - People v. Wilson · People v. Davis · People v. Clapp · 85 Cal. App. 406 - People v. Derrick · 65 Cal. App. 2d 709 - People v. James
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * So, here, since the act of placing a bet, without which of course, the bet could not be received by another, was punishable as a separate offense under subdivision 6, and not specifically under subdivision S, * * * and Pease was not an accomplice of appellant who received the bet. The testimony of Pease was sufficient, without corroboration, to prove the offense charged in count one.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davie““* * * one who is liable to prosecution for the identical offense charged against the defendant on trial in the cause in which the testimony of the accomplice is given,””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.