Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 CALAPP3D 549 - People v. Huff

People v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 1994

22 state decisions

140197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · People v. Mickelson · 18 Cal. 3d 889 - People v. DeVaughn · 9 Cal. 3d 871 - People v. Dumas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a matter of pure speculation whether Mr. Crosetti [owner] would have discovered his loss in the absence of the telephone call from the police. Even assuming that he would have discovered the loss at some point in time, it remains a matter for speculation whether he would have connected defendant with that loss and whether he would have reported the loss to the police.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.