State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
2 district · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Wardlow · State v. Golding · Brown v. Texas · Reno v. Kim Ho Ma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[has] stated that [t]he impeachment of a witness by extrinsic evidence [of a prior inconsistent statement pursuant to § 6-10 of the Connecticut Code of Evidence ] is somewhat limited. Not only must the inconsistent statements be relevant and of such a kind as would affect the credibility of the witness ... but generally a foundation should be laid at the time of cross-examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“posted in a manner prescribed by law,” or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.