Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 CONNAPP 377 - State v. Ward

State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Wardlow · State v. Golding · Brown v. Texas · Reno v. Kim Ho Ma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[has] stated that [t]he impeachment of a witness by extrinsic evidence [of a prior inconsistent statement pursuant to § 6-10 of the Connecticut Code of Evidence ] is somewhat limited. Not only must the inconsistent statements be relevant and of such a kind as would affect the credibility of the witness ... but generally a foundation should be laid at the time of cross-examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “posted in a manner prescribed by law,” or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.