State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Golding · Negron v. United States · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Courts have held that the mere passage of time between when a defendant is advised of his Miranda rights and when he gives a statement does not necessarily render the confession involuntary, even if the defendant is not readvised of his rights prior to giving a statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The courts have generally rejected a per se rule as to when a suspect must be readvised of his rights after the passage of time or a change in questioners.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.