Armstrong v. Chemical Nat. Bank of New York’s Empirical Analysis
83 F. 556 · 1897
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1938
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Merchants' Bank v. State Bank · Bibb v. Allen · Martin v. Webb · Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Morgan · First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of Baltimore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The subordinates in the bank * * * recognized Harper as the manager, not only of the bank, hut of the directors. * :J: * >t”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Atherton v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.